Roulette Systems: DP Dozens ππ
Air Date: |
![]() | System Type: | πͺ Ladder |
---|---|---|---|
Buy-in: |
|
Bet per Spin: |
|
Total Bets: | $7,600 | Total Win/Loss: | +$170 |
Total Expected Loss: | -$399.76 | Total Comp Value: | $79.95 |
Total Spins: | 27 | Seconds between Spins: | 19 |
Rating: | JackAce Rating: |
Betting Simplicity: |
![]() |
Progression Simplicity: |
![]() |
---|---|---|---|
Chip Uniformity: |
![]() |
Jackpot Potential: |
![]() |
Scalability: |
![]() |
Comp Value: |
![]() |
Betting Schemes
Tier 1 ($20)| Tier 2 ($40)| Tier 3 ($60)| Tier 4 ($80)| Tier 5 ($100)| Tier 6 ($120)| Tier 7 ($140)| Tier 8 ($160)| Tier 9 ($180)| Tier 10 ($200)| Tier 11 ($220)| Tier 12 ($240)| Tier 13 ($260)| Tier 14 ($280)| Tier 15 ($300)| Tier 16 ($320)| Tier 17 ($340)| Tier 18 ($360)| Tier 19 ($380)| Tier 20 ($400)| Tier 21 ($420)| Tier 22 ($440)| Tier 23 ($460)| Tier 24 ($480)| Tier 25 ($500)| Tier 26 ($540)| Tier 27 ($560)
View this bet in the Roulette Bet Analyzer
This is neither a β¬οΈ Positive Progression nor a β¬οΈ Negative Progression system. It's a πͺ Ladder system, where you keep adding $10 to your bet no matter what.
You're supposed to reset to your inital bet when you're up $100.
Systems like this are the case of the tail wagging the dog. You're just going to keep increasing your bets to the point where the first few bets never matter. Everything just hinges on the big bets. Not really much of a system at all.
The main player said they were
up
+$20,
but I have them being
up
+$170.
Spin # | Number | Result | Amount Bet | Running Total | Time | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
|
+$10 | $20 | +$10 | 1:02 | |
2 |
|
-$40 WHACK |
$40 | -$30 | 1:22 | |
3 |
|
-$60 WHACK |
$60 | -$90 | 1:33 | |
4 |
|
-$80 WHACK |
$80 | -$170 | 1:53 | |
5 |
|
+$50 | $100 | -$120 | 2:09 | |
6 |
|
-$120 WHACK |
$120 | -$240 | 2:21 | |
7 |
|
-$140 WHACK |
$140 | -$380 | 2:35 | |
8 |
|
-$160 WHACK |
$160 | -$540 | 2:53 | |
9 |
|
-$180 WHACK |
$180 | -$720 | 3:18 | |
10 |
|
-$200 WHACK |
$200 | -$920 | 3:42 | |
11 |
|
+$110 | $220 | -$810 | 4:04 | |
12 |
|
+$120 | $240 | -$690 | 4:35 | |
13 |
|
+$130 | $260 | -$560 | 5:04 | |
14 |
|
+$140 | $280 | -$420 | 5:32 | |
15 |
|
-$150 | $300 | -$570 | 6:02 | |
16 |
|
+$160 | $320 | -$410 | 6:18 | |
17 |
|
+$170 | $340 | -$240 | 6:35 | |
18 |
|
-$360 WHACK |
$360 | -$600 | 6:56 | |
19 |
|
-$380 WHACK |
$380 | -$980 | 7:12 | |
20 |
|
+$200 | $400 | -$780 | 7:36 | |
21 |
|
+$210 | $420 | -$570 | 7:47 | Alex should have moved his bet from the first dozen because it hit on the previous spin |
22 |
|
+$220 | $440 | -$350 | 8:28 | |
23 |
|
+$230 | $460 | -$120 | 8:59 | |
24 |
|
+$240 | $480 | +$120 | 9:10 | |
25 |
|
-$500 WHACK |
$500 | -$380 | 9:27 | |
26 |
|
+$270 | $540 | -$110 | 9:47 |
Result displayed in video was
+$260
Bet should have been $520 |
27 |
|
+$280 | $560 | +$170 | 9:59 |
Result displayed in video was
+$270
Bet should have been $540 |
Expected Loss |
Total Bets |
Total Win/Loss |
||||
-$399.76 | $7,600 | +$170 |