Roulette Systems: Quarter and Dimes πͺπͺ
Air Date: |
![]() | System Type: | β¬οΈ Positive Progression |
---|---|---|---|
Buy-in: |
|
Bet per Spin: |
|
Total Bets: | $1,985 | Total Win/Loss: | -$575 |
Total Expected Loss: | -$104.41 | Total Comp Value: | $20.88 |
Total Spins: | 26 | Seconds between Spins: | 27 |
Rating: | JackAce Rating: |
Betting Simplicity: |
![]() |
Progression Simplicity: |
![]() |
---|---|---|---|
Chip Uniformity: |
![]() |
Jackpot Potential: |
![]() |
Scalability: |
![]() |
Comp Value: |
![]() |
Betting Schemes
Tier 1 ($70)| Tier 2 ($125)| Tier 3 ($80)| Tier 4 ($130)| Tier 5 ($130)
View this bet in the Roulette Bet Analyzer
This is a goofy ass β¬οΈ Positive Progression system. You basically bet on two Dozens and juice the bets with two Street bets. If you hit the jackpot, then you YOLO the winnings on a bunch of Straight-Up bets.
What makes this system "goofy" is that I am pretty sure Alex just slapped a bunch of bets on the table after hitting those jackpot wins. I don't think there was any rhyme or reason for picking the numbers and the amounts that he bet. The only stipulation is that they all added up to the most recent win.
Since there's no real definition to those higher tier "house money" bets, there's no real way I can evaluate this system accurately. I can't tell you how successful you will be with a system like this because it all depends on the strict definition of those big bets.
For that reason, I am rating this system a
. It's a shame, because this system has a lot of potential. With just a few tweaks, it could be a or a .Friend #1 Results
Spin # | Number | Result | Amount Bet | Running Total | Time | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
|
+$125 | $70 | +$125 | 0:43 | |
2 |
|
+$55 | $125 | +$180 | 1:22 | |
3 |
|
-$125 WHACK |
$125 | +$55 | 2:10 | |
4 |
|
-$70 WHACK |
$70 | -$15 | 2:59 |
Result displayed in video was
-$125
|
5 |
|
+$5 | $70 | -$10 | 3:22 | |
6 |
|
+$5 | $70 | -$5 | 3:44 | |
7 |
|
+$130 | $80 | +$125 | 4:21 | Alex decided to press up the dozens on step 1 here |
8 |
|
+$25 | $125 | +$150 | 4:49 | |
9 |
|
-$130 WHACK |
$130 | +$20 | 5:23 | Alex decided to press up the $125 bet on step 2 here |
10 |
|
+$5 | $70 | +$25 | 6:08 | |
11 |
|
-$70 WHACK |
$70 | -$45 | 6:18 | |
12 |
|
+$5 | $70 | -$40 | 6:41 | |
13 |
|
-$70 WHACK |
$70 | -$110 | 7:23 | |
14 |
|
+$5 | $70 | -$105 | 7:39 | |
15 |
|
-$70 WHACK |
$70 | -$175 | 7:58 | |
16 |
|
+$5 | $70 | -$170 | 8:35 | |
17 |
|
-$70 WHACK |
$70 | -$240 | 9:18 | |
Expected Loss |
Total Bets |
Total Win/Loss |
||||
-$74.95 | $1,425 | -$240 |
Friend #2 Results
Spin # | Number | Result | Amount Bet | Running Total | Time | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
18 |
|
-$70 WHACK |
$70 | -$70 | 9:48 | Alex bought in for more here. |
19 |
|
-$70 WHACK |
$70 | -$140 | 10:09 |
Result displayed in video was
-$75
|
20 |
|
+$5 | $70 | -$135 | 10:25 | |
21 |
|
-$70 WHACK |
$70 | -$205 | 10:35 | |
22 |
|
-$70 WHACK |
$70 | -$275 | 10:43 | |
23 |
|
+$5 | $70 | -$270 | 10:55 | |
24 |
|
+$5 | $70 | -$265 | 11:16 | |
25 |
|
-$70 WHACK |
$70 | -$335 | 11:54 | Alex had to buy in for more to cover this bet. |
26 |
|
$0 | $0 | -$335 | 12:32 | |
Expected Loss |
Total Bets |
Total Win/Loss |
||||
-$29.45 | $560 | -$335 |